Model deskSynthetic data
DevelopingFederal rescheduling: the broader proceeding is stayed. See the order and the next filing date.Official docket

Filed to this desk

Reporting

All reporting →

No published reporting has been filed to this desk yet.

Mojave Quant Terminal · model desk

Desk instrument

Full terminal →

Tao structure–randomness dichotomy · Stable PCP

Wholesale demand decomposer

M = Lmacro-tourism + Sinsider-anomaly + Rretail-noise

Synthetic demonstration data. Fifty-two weeks of transfer volumes, lounge traffic and excise receipts for eight Nevada series, generated with known tourism structure and five planted shocks so that recovery can be scored.

Explained by structure L57%rank 2 · tourism waves
Sparse shocks S535% of variance
Planted shocks recovered4/5precision 80%
Residual inside MP bulk100%R is pseudorandom
  • Observed M
  • Structure L
  • Shock S
5.0k6.0k7.0kW1W8W15W22W29W36W43W50CESBig-game weekendSpring convention blockFestival weekendSEMAF1 Las Vegas GPMJBizConNew Year's EveObservedStructure

Detected structural shocks

WeekSeriesShockzTruth
W17Nye County / Pahrump transfers+2,204 lb/wk23.0Planted
W31North Las Vegas transfers+1,849 lb/wk16.6Planted
W23Henderson transfers-1,419 lb/wk13.1Planted
W38Washoe / Reno transfers+684 lb/wk4.1Planted
W47Strip lounge foot-traffic index+10 index1.6False alarm

What a desk editor reads

  • Strip-corridor retail transfers: no isolated shock at this threshold.
  • Tourism structure explains 57% of variance; events, not noise, drive the peaks.
  • Each shock is a reporting lead. It still needs the manifest, the licensee and a right of reply.
Quant viewInspect the math & raw telemetry

Program

min ‖L‖* + λ‖S‖1 + (1/2μ)‖M − L − S‖²F

Block-coordinate descent: L ← Dμ(M − S) (singular value thresholding), S ← soft(M − L, λμ). L is then debiased to the unshrunk rank-r projection and S to its support.

Noise σ (whitened)
1.00
μ = σ(√m + √n)
10.040
λ (this run)
0.3486
λ Candès universal 1/√n
0.1387
Iterations
13
Singular values of L
19.33, 17.84

Residual spectrum vs Marchenko–Pastur

Eigenvalues of (1/m)RᵀR against the bulk [σ²(1−√γ)², σ²(1+√γ)²], γ = 0.154.

MP bulk
[0.369, 1.938]
Eigenvalues
1.161, 0.948, 0.908, 0.667, 0.343, 0.281, 0.154, 0.015

Raw weekly telemetry · Strip-corridor retail transfers

WeekMLSR
W15.7k5.8k·-56
W27.3k7.2k·114
W35.7k5.7k·-20
W45.0k5.0k·-22
W55.5k5.4k·102
W66.0k6.2k·-222
W75.4k5.4k·-16
W85.1k4.9k·171
W94.9k4.9k·27
W105.5k5.4k·59
W115.8k5.7k·108
W125.4k5.3k·93
W135.2k5.2k·31
W144.9k4.9k·43
W155.1k4.9k·150
W164.9k4.9k·-9
W175.1k5.3k·-217
W185.3k5.4k·-141
W196.1k6.0k·18
W207.3k7.0k·306
W216.1k6.2k·-161
W225.9k5.8k·138
W236.0k5.6k·425
W245.5k5.6k·-120
W255.6k5.5k·45
W265.6k5.5k·89
W275.7k5.6k·141
W285.6k5.6k·16
W295.6k5.6k·14
W305.5k5.6k·-43
W315.7k5.7k·20
W325.5k5.5k·-26
W335.7k5.6k·135
W345.5k5.5k·-42
W355.5k5.4k·108
W365.6k5.5k·73
W375.4k5.6k·-141
W385.5k5.8k·-293
W395.8k5.5k·279
W405.4k5.5k·-117
W415.3k5.2k·96
W425.3k5.4k·-111
W435.9k5.9k·-27
W446.4k6.6k·-213
W456.0k5.9k·56
W466.4k6.4k·3
W477.7k7.7k·0
W487.0k7.1k·-84
W497.0k6.9k·153
W505.9k5.8k·79
W516.1k6.1k·-29
W527.2k7.1k·65